Tulsa's Therapuetic Courts - Alternatives: Tulsa Drug Court, Tulsa DUI Court, Tulsa Mental Health Court, Tulsa Veterans Court, Tulsa Accelerated Accountability Procedure - Community Sentencing
by Glen R. Graham, Attorney at Law Telephone: (918) 583-4621 or (918) 260-8184
1612 S. Cincinnati Ave., Tulsa, Oklahoma
Tulsa Criminal Defense Attorney - Tulsa Therapuetic Courts
Posted by
Glen Graham
0
comments
Can People Retain Their Humanity in a Sterile Court Room Setting?
In, ROY v. STATE, 1979 OK CR 115, 602 P.2d 226 , the Oklahoma Court of Criminal Appeals in reversing a first degree burglary conviction from Tulsa, Oklahoma, held that the breaking and entering in this case was "not the sort contemplated by the Legislature in this statute, but was concomitant with the physical attack on the complaining witness." A man had a confrontation with a neighbor yelling through a window at his neighbor and the defendant hit him through the open window and ended up inside the home having a physical altercation. The guy either hit him through the window screen or the screen either fell down or was moved during the altercation but the court found that this was "not the sort" of breaking and entering contemplated by the legislature.
I would theorize that in 1979 under the specific facts of the Roy case, the court viewed the altercation as an invited or "mutual combat" type situation in which the "complainig" party was not a truly "innocent" party but was partly at fault for inviting a physical confrontation with his neighbor. In the sterile setting of a court room, three times removed from everyday life, a person might theorize that the neighbor should have been a "better man" and ignored the taunts and insults and disparaging comments of his neighbor. In theory, "sticks and stones may break my bones but words will never hurt me." In real life, in the grimey world of the everyday working man or woman, people do not just ignore the taunts and insults and disparaging comments of other people. People react. Anyone is capable of reacting. Even a judge, prosecutor, internet blog reader, police officer or just the everyday ordinary individual. However, how the person choses to react can mean all the difference in the world from being charged with a serious crime or not.
Pull out a gun and shoot the person and you will be charged with murder. Stab the person and you will be charged with a felony. Hit the person with a fist and you will be charged with assault and battery. If you are a judge, I guess if it occurs in open court, the person will be arresed for contempt of court. If you are a police officer, and you carry a gun and a badge, and in theory you are trained to to react correctly to mere insults without losing your temper and beating the crap out of the guy or gal. If you are a lawyer, I guess you sue, (in theory). Counselor's talk about "self-control" and "anger management" and theorize that this person is re-living some past issues in their lives.
Some courts are less willing to look at the practical aspects, some one invites mutual combat and gets hit through a window and ends up inside the home. Is it first degree burglary or assault and battery? Moving the screen or the screen being pushed out of the way, does that make it a first degree burglary? Was there evidence about the screen --- did it fall down --- was it even on at the time --- ?
There is no specific jury instruction on "mutual combat" and the law does not formally recognize "mutual combat." Informally, it is an accepted fact of everyday life that people on occasion are going to engage in "mutual combat" and some people call it "professional wrestling" or "boxing" or "football" or "soccer" or other types of competitve and combative sports.
Has our society changed our people such that only "effiminate" non-competitive, soft, flakey, easy going, intellectuals are in charge and the rough and tumble, hearty, competitive, hard, macho man is no longer acceptable?
Have we become a society of "wimps," "losers," "cry-babies," "momma's boys," "effiminate-soft-scardy-cats" ?
Can juries retain their common sense and see through the over-charging and over-prosecution of people living in the real world and not in a sterile court room setting? Can judges retain their common sense and humanity in a court room and their "gate-keeper" function or do they merely cave into political pressure?
Can prosecutors look beyond the face of the charges and see the underlying common sense questions --- guy insults neighbor --- neighbor hits him --- what would be the right conviction --- felony burglary or misdemeanor assault and battery? It is common knowledge that prosecutors sometimes file the most severe charges because the cases are often plea bargained down to a lesser offense. What about the defense lawyer, does he or she have common sense? Shouldn't a defense lawyer see that this is really primarily a misdemeanor assault and battery and not a true first degree burglary? Shouldn't a police officer be trained to handle mere spoken insults without over-reacting and beating the crap out of the guy or gal and then calling it "resisting arrest" or "obstructing an officer"? Doesn't a certain amount of name calling come with any job --- lawyer or police officer? Are we wimps with thin skins who over react to stupid jokes and "put-downs" and "come-ons"?
Why did God give us a brain if we don't use it? What makes a human different that the savage beast of the field --- isn't it in part the conscience and the "moral" understanding and ability to have a sense of self-lessness and a willingness to give to fellow human beings and a higher sense of understanding than just being a beast of the field? If man is made in the image of God, shouldn't man have "moral" values and a higher understanding and conscience rather than just living on instincts and in a survival mode?
Can jurors and judges and lawyers and police officers retain their Humanity?
Posted by
Glen Graham
0
comments
Some Factors Considered in Negotiating a Plea Bargain in a Tulsa Criminal Case
Posted by
Glen Graham
1 comments
The Art and Science of Defending the Accused
The philosophy of defending the accused successfully is both an art and a science. It requires the creativity and ingenuity of an artist and the reality grounded scientific principles of a scientist. A skillful criminal defense attorney is both an artist and a scientist.
A skillful defender should spend significant time, thinking about the case, discussing the facts thoroughly with the defendant, and researching the law, and investigating the facts. Sometimes it is helpful to relive the incident, moment by moment, just like a drama or a play. Sometimes it may be helpful to return to the scene and take pictures.
A skillful lawyer will look at the jury instructions for any legal defenses that are available on the case both factually and legally.
Sometimes it is useful to discuss the facts with other lawyers and see who has had a similar case and what legal arguments are available.
It is always helpful to know the judges preferences and the prosecutor's style.
It is sometimes helpful to Ask other lawyers what they know about the prosecutor and the judge.
With words, the lawyer skillfully paints the client's story in artistic phrases and expresses the defenses in the case to achieve the best possible out-come.
To be blunt, the Best Criminal Defense Lawyer is going to work, work, and work. There is no substitute for hard work.
I almost left out proper reference to Mark Bennett's blog, The Art and Science of Defending People, wherein he says that all lawyers are frustrated artists and the following:
"It is true that defending people well requires creativity. It also requires imagination, curiosity, flexibility, adaptability, and a willingness to take risks. In other words, it takes a childlike mind. A defense lawyer who thinks like a grownup, suppressing the ideas that are likely to be unpopular or unsuccessful, is often going to fail to find the best defense. (This may help explain why so many of us are lousy businessmen.)
We are all born with imaginative, playful, flexible minds (Pablo Picasso said, “Every child is an artist. The problem is how to remain an artist once he grows up.”). With the help of an educational system and a culture that tell us to “grow up,” most of us get over it: the childlike mind is still there, but suppressed, more or less, under a layer of “maturity.”
Elsewhere, in Bennett's blog: "So who’s the defender and who’s the prosecutor? Well, it’s like they say: Some days you’re the retiarius and some days you’re the secutor."
Lastly, Bennett says: "Someone once told me, and I long accepted, that all lawyers are frustrated artists."
Bennett says it eloquently, skillfully, and artistically, in everyday language anyone can understand.
By Glen R. Graham, Tulsa Criminal Lawyer http://www.glenrgraham.com
Posted by
Glen Graham
2
comments
Tulsa Criminal Attorney Creative Ideas on Defending DUI and DWI
Tulsa Criminal Attorney Creative Ideas on Defending DUI and DWI
By Glen R. Graham, Tulsa Criminal Attorney, Email: glengraham@icu.net
The Graham Law Firm consists of me and three other attorneys. I am a Tulsa Criminal Attorney who has been defending Tulsa felony and misdemeanor criminal cases including Tulsa DUI and DWI cases for over 21 years now. Some of the creative ideas that I have discovered in defending these types of cases include:
Requesting an administrative hearing on your drivers license within 15 days of the date of your arrest for DUI. You only have 15 days from the date of your arrest to request a hearing on your drivers license. It says that on the back of the temporary license that you should have been given. Everyone is presumed to know the law, so if you fail to request a hearing within 15 days after the date of your arrest you forfeit your right to request a hearing on your drivers license.
The hearing on your drivers license is a "free" chance for me, if I am your lawyer, to challenge the evidence in the case. It is a chance to challenge the basis of the stop and the sufficiency of the evidence.
It is an administrative hearing before a department of public safety official. Most of the time you may lose that hearing but it gives you a chance to hear the evidence and for me as your lawyer to use it as a "discovery" tool. It is worth it to have the hearing because it allows me to discover any weaknesses in the state's case and to see if the officer will show up on the matter.
In a few cases, the officer may not appear and sometimes there are mistakes made and you win the hearing. If you lose the hearing, you have the right to appeal by filing a petition to challenge the sufficiency of the case. It does cost money to appeal but if you win the appeal, sometimes you may be offered a temporary license to drive. Also, you may receive a temporary license to drive while the appeal is pending.
Sometimes, it is useful to obtain written statements from any witnesses who can verify that you were not intoxicated at the time you left the business establishment or other place. It is illegal for a business to serve an intoxicated person. It may be illegal for a person to serve alcohol to an intoxicated person and then to allow them to drive home. Obtaining written statements from people who can verify that you were not intoxicated can be helpful.
The DUI laws are based upon the false assumption that everyone responds the same way to alcohol. It is based upon an "average" response by an "average" size person with "average" characteristics. This false "average" does not exist in the real world. People are made up of different sizes and people absorb alcohol at different rates. People of different sizes, and with different physical conditions, with different circumstances - such as the amount of food in the persons stomach, and whether they have past experiences with alcohol and have developed a "tolerance" to alcohol and are still able to function. There are a multitude of factors that can affect whether a person is actually "over the limit" and d.u.i. or whether they are just a little impaired. The law takes an "average" and attempts to apply this to everyone. Some people believe this law is discriminatory and violates the laws of science but it creates a legal "presumption" of intoxication if one "scores" above the "average" imputed limit. There have been a multitude of articles that argue that this violates the "presumption of innocence" and creates a "presumption of guilt" just because someone violates the "average" when in fact they may not be "average."
I have previously blogged about the "Inherent Unfairness of DUI Laws" in my blog here on June of 2007: The Inherent Unfairness of DUI Laws
http://tulsacriminaldefense.blogspot.com/2007/06/inherent-unfairness-in-dui-laws.html
I have been practicing law now for over 21 years, and I know all of the Tulsa judges, and I believe I have a good relationship with our judges. I also travel to the surrounding areas and I am a Criminal Attorney for Glenpool, Collinsville, Broken Arrow, Jenks, Bixby, Sapulpa, Owasso, Sand Springs, Tulsa, Oklahoma City, and others.
I believe I have a good reputation as an Oklahoma Criminal Attorney, and I am a member of the Oklahoma Criminal Defense Lawyers Association and the Tulsa Criminal Defense Lawyers Association, and the Oklahoma DUI Attorney Group, and the Tulsa DUI Attorney Group, and other organizations committed to defending the constitutional rights of people.
The specific facts of the case are always relevant and a good source of defenses. I would encourage you to schedule an appointment with my Tulsa Criminal Attorney Lawyer Office so we discuss the specific facts of your case for any possible defenses. Call my office at (918) 583-4621.
Glen R. Graham, Tulsa Criminal Attorney, Tulsa, Oklahoma http://www.glenrgraham.com/
Posted by
Glen Graham
1 comments
google93db7121f134b7fa.html
http://www.tulsacriminaldefense.blogspot.com/google93db7121f134b7fa.html
This is the Google Verification File. This blog is published. Corrected google verification.
http://www.tulsacriminaldefense.blogspot.com/google93db7121f134b7fa.html
Posted by
Glen Graham
0
comments
Tulsa Jail Phone Calls Recorded and Letters Xeroxed
Tulsa Jail Phone Calls Recorded and Letters Xeroxed
by Glen R. Graham, Tulsa Criminal Defense Attorney, Tulsa, Oklahoma
Phone: (918) 583-4621 or email: glengraham@icu.net
Notice to everyone: All telephone calls from the jail are recorded and saved for at least three (3) years and the telephone conversations may be used against you. All letters into and out of the jail are xeroxed and copies are saved for use against the parties at trial or for investigation.
My clients in the Tulsa Jail continue to call me collect on occasion and want to discuss the facts of their case even though their phone calls are being recorded and I have to remind them of the above. They will also call their relatives and friends and sometimes discuss the facts of their case ---- forgetting that the call is being recorded and saved to be used against them.
Please, please, please --- everyone keep in mind the telephone calls from the Tulsa Jail are recorded!
Yours in the Defense of Fellow Human Beings,
Glen R. Graham, Tulsa Criminal Defense Lawyer, Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posted by
Glen Graham
0
comments
Well, What are You Going to Do for Me? Work, Work, Work!!!
What are You Going to Do For Me? Work, Work, Work!!!
by Glen R. Graham, Oklahoma Criminal Defense Attorney, Email: glengraham@icu.net
Most client's charged with a serious crime want to know what the lawyer is going to do for them. The answer usually boils down to the philosophy of work, work, work. The first step is conducting your own independent investigation of the facts. Maybe, visiting the actual scene of the crime. Consider taking photographs of the scene and looking for evidence. Maybe even take the client back to the scene an re-live the incident --- maybe do some psycho-drama. It can provide real power in testifying when the client re-lives the incident and discusses all the emotions. It can increase the authenticity of the client when testifying in court. I will talk to the witnesses. Especially, I will talk to the client to gather up all the facts in the matter. That's why is can be very frustrating when the client wants to know what you are going to do for me? Well, most importantly, the client must come to the office and discuss the case. You might be surprised how many client's seem to not have the time to come to my office to discuss their case. How can I adequately prepare for the case when the client won't even come to my office? Are they afraid of me? Are they avoiding me because they don't have that payment for me that they promised me some time back? Sometimes, it makes me wonder? It is absolutely necessary to conduct an in depth interview of the client to find out all facts, issues, and all evidence and witnesses in the case.
One thing I will do, I will try to out-work the prosecutor. The prosecutor has multiple cases that he is handling all at the same time. The prosecutor is a professional juggler, handling many cases, hoping none of them fall. My practice is limited to just a few cases by comparison and I can spend more time on the case which should produce a better out-come.
I am going to devise a defense strategy and work on the theme of the case. I am going to research the law and study the statutes and cases dealing with all the issues in the case. I am going to study the facts and the law. One trick I have learned over the years, (21 years) is to look at the jury instructions to see what defenses might be available and to look at the jury instructions regarding the legal issues that will be presented to the jury. However, the jury is also the judge of the facts and therefore I must gather up all relevant facts which will assist me in advocating my client's side of the case to the jury.
I am going to file motions in the case. I am going to file a request and motion for discovery and obtain copies of all the law enforcement reports in this case and any exculpatory evidence. I am going to look for issues around the arrest and the search and seizure. I will file motions to suppress or motions to quash the arrest and/or motions to quash the information and/or motions to dismiss and/or other motions which will assist us in pursuing a defense in the matter.
I am going to prepare for a trial in the case.
I am going to advise my client how to behave, how to dress for court, and what to expect.
I am going to be over-prepared for court. I am going to out-work the prosecutor.
I am going to work, work, work.
Yours in the Defense of Fellow Human Beings,
Glen R. Graham, Attorney for the Accused, Tulsa, Oklahoma
Posted by
Glen Graham
0
comments
Protecting the Rights to a Fair Trial Against Unfair Media Stories
Protecting the Rights to A Fair Trial Against Unfair Media Stories in Oklahoma by Glen R. Graham, Attorney at Law 918.583-4621
It is important for any trial attorney to be aware of the Code of Professional Journalism at Society of Professional Journalist web site.
One of the options that a good criminal attorney has is to seek a protective order from the court by filing a motion for a protective order. While there are many limitations on "gag" orders and the media may attempt to challenge the constitutionality of the same, it may be possible to seek an order from the court directing the prosecutor and his staff and the law enforcement personnel be prohibited from releasing certain kinds of questionable facts such as:
Illegal Confessions; Statements of the Accused; Questionable Out of Court Identifications; Illegal Evidence or Evidence Illegally Acquired; and the release of any facts which may cause undue prejudice to a fair trial such as the prior criminal record of the accused.
From Wikipedia: “Guaranteeing the presumption of innocence extends beyond the judicial system. For instance, in many countries journalistic codes of ethics state that journalists should refrain from referring to suspects as though their guilt is certain. For example, they use "suspect" when referring to the suspect, and use "allegedly" when referring to the criminal activity that the suspect is accused of.”
“More subtly, publishing of the prosecution's case without proper defense argumentation may in practice constitute presumption of guilt. Publishing a roster of arrested suspects may constitute undeserved punishment as well, since in practice it damages the reputation of innocent suspects.”
Most journalists in the U.S. abide by the Code of Ethics of the Society for Professional Journalists. The code has been revised many times, but today’s code basically instructs journalists to (1) seek truth and report it, (2) minimize harm, (3) act independently and (4) be accountable. The Society of Professional Journalist does not have an enforcement mechanism to enforce its code. It has debated this matter but due to the special nature of the first amendment and the availability of other mechanisms for holding journalist accountable, there is no enforcement mechanism. The code currently is a basic guideline for journalists who are members of the society which is voluntary. Integrity and credibility are considered crucial to many journalists .
Preamble to the Code of Ethics of Professional Journalists
By the Society of Professional Journalists
Preamble to the Code of Ethics of Society for Professional Journalists:
“Members of the Society of Professional Journalists believe that public enlightenment is the forerunner of justice and the foundation of democracy. The duty of the journalist is to further those ends by seeking truth and providing a fair and comprehensive account of events and issues. Conscientious journalists from all media and specialties strive to serve the public with thoroughness and honesty. Professional integrity is the cornerstone of a journalist's credibility. Members of the Society share a dedication to ethical behavior and adopt this code to declare the Society's principles and standards of practice.”
Additionally, the Code says journalists should:
— Give voice to the voiceless; official and unofficial sources of information can be equally valid.
— Distinguish between advocacy and news reporting. Analysis and commentary should be labeled and not misrepresent fact or context.
Minimize Harm - Ethical journalists treat sources, subjects and colleagues as human beings deserving of respect. Journalists should:
— Show compassion for those who may be affected adversely by news coverage. Use special sensitivity when dealing with children and inexperienced sources or subjects.
— Be sensitive when seeking or using interviews or photographs of those affected by tragedy or grief.
— Recognize that gathering and reporting information may cause harm or discomfort. Pursuit of the news is not a license for arrogance.
— Recognize that private people have a greater right to control information about themselves than do public officials and others who seek power, influence or attention. Only an overriding public need can justify intrusion into anyone’s privacy.
— Show good taste. Avoid pandering to lurid curiosity.
— Be cautious about identifying juvenile suspects or victims of sex crimes.
— Be judicious about naming criminal suspects before the formal filing of charges.
— Balance a criminal suspect’s fair trial rights with the public’s right to be informed.
Act Independently -Journalists should be free of obligation to any interest other than the public's right to know.
— Be vigilant and courageous about holding those with power accountable.— Deny favored treatment to advertisers and special interests and resist their pressure to influence news coverage.
Be Accountable> - Journalists are accountable to their readers, listeners, viewers and each other.
— Clarify and explain news coverage and invite dialogue with the public over journalistic conduct.
— Encourage the public to voice grievances against the news media.
— Admit mistakes and correct them promptly.
— Expose unethical practices of journalists and the news media.
— Abide by the same high standards to which they hold others.
Struggling with a dilemma on deadline, or just want to talk about a tough call you've had to make concerning an ethical question about journalism? Call the Society of Professional Journalist at 317/927.8000 x208 Simply make the call, leave a message. The SPJ has many journalists and journalism educators on its ethics committee willing to assist anyone who makes a call to its hotline; that includes non-journalists who have questions about the ethics of journalism but there is no code enforcement mechanism regarding journalists.
The Society of Professional Journalist web site at Society of Professional Journalist web site also has a message board where messages are posted and issues discussed by members at message board of SPJ .
Yours in the Defense of Fellow Human Beings,
Glen R. Graham, Tulsa Criminal Attorney, 918.583.4621
Posted by
Glen Graham
0
comments